Hello !
Trace: • Research Outlook • Validating Sensors • Overview of V&V Techniques • Principles of Instructions Encoding • Reference Architectures for Autonomous Systems • References • Module: Autonomous Vehicles • Application Domains – Aerial, Ground, and Marine Vehicle Architectures • Green Energy Sources in IoT • VREL #1 and #3: General Purpose IoT Laboratory, air receiving nodes 1 and 3

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
en:safeav:hmc:safety [2025/10/20 18:41] – raivo.sellen:safeav:hmc:safety [2025/10/20 18:43] (current) – ToDo checked: raivo.sell
Line 2: Line 2:
 {{:en:iot-open:czapka_m.png?50| Masters (2nd level) classification icon }} {{:en:iot-open:czapka_m.png?50| Masters (2nd level) classification icon }}
  
-<todo @raivo.sell></todo> +<todo @raivo.sell #raivo.sell:2025-10-20></todo>
-====== Safety Concerns and Public Acceptance ======+
  
 The integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) into everyday traffic introduces both technological and societal challenges. While automated driving systems aim to eliminate human error and improve efficiency, the perceived safety and acceptance of these systems remain crucial for their widespread adoption. Ensuring that people *trust* the technology is equally important as ensuring that the technology *functions safely*. The integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) into everyday traffic introduces both technological and societal challenges. While automated driving systems aim to eliminate human error and improve efficiency, the perceived safety and acceptance of these systems remain crucial for their widespread adoption. Ensuring that people *trust* the technology is equally important as ensuring that the technology *functions safely*.
Line 24: Line 23:
 ===== Experience as a Driver of Acceptance ===== ===== Experience as a Driver of Acceptance =====
  
-Studies show that direct experience with AVs significantly improves user attitudes. People who have ridden in an autonomous shuttle or interacted with one in a real environment tend to report higher trust and readiness to use the technology again. Conversely, those who have only heard about it through media or social networks often express greater skepticism.+Empirical research has shown that direct experience with AVs strongly increases trust. In one Estonian field study (Kalda, Sell & Soe, 2021), the majority of first-time users reported **a high sense of safety and comfort**, with over **90% indicating willingness to use autonomous shuttles again** after their initial ride.  
  
-This indicates that pilot programs, demonstration events, and interactive simulations play a vital role in bridging the gap between innovation and public perception. Continuous exposure helps normalize the idea of shared roads between humans and autonomous systems.+Such results confirm that personal experience and well-managed demonstrations are key factors in shaping public perception. People who interact directly with autonomous vehicles tend to transition from curiosity to trust, whereas those without exposure often remain cautious or skeptical. This highlights the importance of continuous testing, education, and public engagement.
  
 ===== Social, Ethical, and Communication Dimensions ===== ===== Social, Ethical, and Communication Dimensions =====
en/safeav/hmc/safety.1760985666.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/10/20 18:41 by raivo.sell
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0